The Efficiency Paradox: What Big Data Can't Do by Edward Tenner (English) Paperb

Description: The Efficiency Paradox by Edward Tenner "A bold challenge to our obsession with efficiency--and a new understanding of how to benefit from the powerful potential of serendipity"-- FORMAT Paperback LANGUAGE English CONDITION Brand New Publisher Description A "skillful and lucid" (The Wall Street Journal) way of thinking about efficiency, challenging our obsession with it—and offering a new understanding of how to benefit from the powerful potential of serendipity.Algorithms, multitasking, the sharing economy, life hacks: our culture cant get enough of efficiency. One of the great promises of the Internet and big data revolutions is the idea that we can improve the processes and routines of our work and personal lives to get more done in less time than we ever have before. There is no doubt that were performing at higher levels and moving at unprecedented speed, but what if were headed in the wrong direction?Melding the long-term history of technology with the latest headlines and findings of computer science and social science, The Efficiency Paradox questions our ingrained assumptions about efficiency, persuasively showing how relying on the algorithms of digital platforms can in fact lead to wasted efforts, missed opportunities, and, above all, an inability to break out of established patterns. Edward Tenner reveals what we and our institutions, when equipped with an astute combination of artificial intelligence and trained intuition, can learn from the random and unexpected. Author Biography EDWARD TENNER is a distinguished scholar of the Smithsonians Lemelson Center for the Study of Invention and Innovation and a visiting scholar in the Rutgers University Department of History. He was a visiting lecturer at the Humanities Council at Princeton and has held visiting research positions at the Institute for Advanced Study and the University of Pennsylvania. His essays and reviews have appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, The Wilson Quarterly, and Forbes.com, and he has given talks for many organizations, including Microsoft, AT&T, the National Institute on White Collar Crime, the Smithsonian Associates, and TED. His book, Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences, written in part with a Guggenheim Fellowship, has been translated into German, Japanese, Chinese, Italian, Portuguese, and Czech. Review "Skillful and lucid. . . . An important note of caution regarding the velocity of progress. . . . Authors cannot control the current-events environment into which their works are launched, but the timing for The Efficiency Paradox seems propitious. The book arrives as the boomerang-and-backfire effects of Big Data are in the papers, or on your phone, as the case may be... Tenner couldnt have known about looming scandals involving abusers of internet-harvested information. But his concerns with the downside of Big Data deftly anticipated the news." —The Wall Street Journal"A bite on the data-driven hand that feeds the system. . . . As Tenner ranges among case studies from Uber to e-books and platform revolutions, he is a clear champion not of the robot but of the human mind behind its creation, a mind far richer than any algorithm—for the time being, at least." —Kirkus Reviews "Efficiency keeps us focused on our goals, which is good, but, on the flip side, a narrow focus can make us miss things we might have seen if we werent so lasered in on our goals. Its a complex subject, but Tenners smart organization and user-friendly prose style make it entirely accessible to lay readers." —Booklist"[A] perceptive study. . . . Sympathetically critiquing the work of others in this arena, including Nicholas Carr and Cathy ONeill, Tenner calls for a strategy that blends intuition and experience with high technology." —Nature"The idea of a world that is friction free is the technologists dream. In The Efficiency Paradox, Edward Tenner explores what that vision casts aside: from human judgment and seeing the world in shades of gray, to the blessings of serendipity and all of the ethical calls that algorithms cant provide. Tenner holds hope for technology finding a middle way that will bring friction back into the fold, and the benefits will be more than economic—they will be cultural, scientific, political, and social. This is the rare book that doesnt want to divide optimists and pessimists." —Sherry Turkle, Abby Rockefeller Mauzé Professor of the Social Studies of Science and Technology at MIT and author of Reclaiming Conversation and Alone Together"This masterly study challenges naïve assumptions that characterize our twenty-first-century world of electronic hyperefficiency. Computers, big data, and artificial intelligence are too often allowed to supersede human judgment and indeed undermine our very self-confidence as human beings. Yet no electronic machine can match our capacity for the untidy human factors needed to balance the sanitized precision and tunnel vision of our digital devices: holistic thinking, serendipity, and intuition. Tenner urges us to forgive ourselves for being human." —Arthur Molella, Director Emeritus, Smithsonian Lemelson Center for the Study of Invention and Innovation "A marvel of unexpected wisdom and startling examples. . . . A compelling guide through the thicket of choices as we gather knowledge to ease the path to the future. Tenner, an expert in revealing unintended consequences of technological innovation and rushed change, digs deeply in this remarkable account of how efficiencies, big data, and techniques of surveillance produce new awareness while simultaneously leading us astray. . . . The Efficiency Paradox is essential for anyone who wishes to open the gauzy curtains of conventional beliefs." —Gary Alan Fine, James Johnson Professor of Sociology at Northwestern and author of Tiny Publics "Most timely. . . .A clearly written, balanced assessment of the power and the hidden risks of the networked society. . . . Tenner shows how a single-minded drive for robotic efficiency offers short-term gains at the cost of long-term stagnation in this provocative yet optimistic argument for serendipity and human intuition." —Amar Bhidé, Thomas Schmidheiny Professor of International Business at Tufts and author of A Call for Judgment Review Quote "Skillful and lucid... An important note of caution regarding the velocity of progress... Authors cannot control the current-events environment into which their works are launched, but the timing for The Efficiency Paradox seems propitious. The book arrives as the boomerang-and-backfire effects of Big Data are in the papers, or on your phone, as the case may be... Tenner couldnt have known about looming scandals involving abusers of internet-harvested information. But his concerns with the downside of Big Data deftly anticipated the news." --Gregg Easterbrook, The Wall Street Journal "A bite on the data-driven hand that feeds the system... As Tenner ranges among case studies from Uber to e-books and platform revolutions, he is a clear champion not of the robot but of the human mind behind its creation, a mind far richer than any algorithm--for the time being, at least." -- Kirkus "Efficiency keeps us focused on our goals, which is good, but, on the flip side, a narrow focus can make us miss things we might have seen if we werent so lasered in on our goals. Its a complex subject, but Tenners smart organization and user-friendly prose style make it entirely accessible to lay readers." --David Pitt, Booklist "[A] perceptive study... Sympathetically critiquing the work of others in this arena, including Nicholas Carr and Cathy ONeill, Tenner calls for a strategy that blends intuition and experience with high technology." -- Nature "The idea of a world that is friction free is the technologists dream. In The Efficiency Paradox , Edward Tenner explores what that vision casts aside: from human judgment and seeing the world in shades of gray, to the blessings of serendipity and all of the ethical calls that algorithms cant provide. Tenner holds hope for technology finding a middle way that will bring friction back into the fold, and the benefits will be more than economic--they will be cultural, scientific, political, and social. This is the rare book that doesnt want to divide optimists and pessimists." --Sherry Turkle, Abby Rockefeller Mauz Excerpt from Book 1 From Mill to Platform: How the Nineteenth Century Redefined Efficiency and the Twenty-First Has Transformed It We are living in a second age of efficiency. Journalists and entrepreneurs do not use that word as often as they used to. Well see synonyms later. But never far from our minds is consciousness of the value of getting the greatest possible output from available inputs, whether increasing production or profits, or reducing time. My claim that preoccupation with efficiency in the short term may harm efficiency in the long run risks being considered a heresy by some and a truism by others. I hope to show that it is an obvious proposition when one reflects on it. It is also obvious, as I shall suggest in succeeding chapters and in the Conclusion, that combining efficient algorithms with holistic analog understanding can produce far better results than using either strategy alone. But it is not always simple to defend the obvious. It is helpful to see efficiency as a concept that has developed over the past two hundred years or so, and as a set of practices that are much older. The idea of efficiency, as we shall see, emerged in the age of the steam engine and was best expressed not by the eighteenth-century metaphor of a shops division of labor (essential as that remained) but by the substitution of continuous production for the fabrication of one unit at a time. The greatest enterprises invested vast capital and employed up to a hundred thousand workers or more to keep it in operation. Both classical economic liberalism and rival doctrines like Marxism reflected this model; it should not be so surprising that even communist governments admired Western mass production. The importance of technologies of uninterrupted ("continuous process") as opposed to batch production was first underscored by the Swiss architect and critic Siegfried Giedion and the American historian Daniel J. Boorstin in the mid-twentieth century. Rollers, belts, and other devices changed the nature of consumption as well as production. Cable television programs like How Its Made reveal how much of todays industrial processes are already automated, especially when compared to episodes of the Industry on Parade series broadcast on network television in the 1950s. Todays programs will probably look equally quaint in even less time. But further reducing labor costs on assembly lines is not the kind of efficiency that interests us here. It is a new kind of enterprise that has--unforeseen by even the boldest futurists--taken over what Vladimir Lenin called the commanding heights of the economy, dominating its agendas. "Silicon Valley" evokes the mixture of admiration, fear, and scorn once inspired by the grimy industrial metropolises of the Northeast and Midwest, but while an approach to Chicago or Detroit or Pittsburgh by automobile or train can still be a visually striking experience, nothing on the peninsula south of San Francisco is tall enough to inspire awe, stupendous as its wealth has become. The server complexes of its companies are scattered as inconspicuously as possible around the globe. Yet the giants of Silicon Valley have ideas about social organization as radical in their own way as Lenins, and they share with classical communism a passionate faith in efficiency. This chapter will investigate the contrast between continuous process efficiency (which fascinated painters as well as photographers and filmmakers in its monumentality and awesome concreteness) and platform efficiency, which is far more profitable but concealed and evanescent and that takes a leap of artistic imagination to dramatize. It will suggest how matchmaking by electronic networks takes advantagenot only of the steady if recently slowed improvement of the efficiency of integrated circuits, but also of the ability of ingenious computational techniques--algorithms--to multiply the speed of these circuits manyfold. This efficiency raises a profound question, the chapter will argue. Why have these platforms apparently had such little effect on the self-perceived satisfaction of the United States and other nations in which they are most advanced? Why are citizens around the world so unhappy with their governments, so ready to look to extreme solutions? One reason may be that the platform revolution has been diverting talent and capital from other technological projects that could be more transformative. I cannot identify them, nor rule out that they are already well advanced and may flower soon. After all, the U.S. boom after the Second World War was in part based on innovations like broadcast television and dry photocopying that actually were under development during the darkest years of the Great Depression, along with Alan Turings theoretical work that helped make the platform economy possible. The question, which I dont pretend to resolve, is why the platform corporation, so profitable for its investors so far (especially the early ones), has been such an underachiever. Enthusiasts will insist that major innovations commonly have troughs of disappointment; the best is yet to come. This is especially the viewpoint of Facebook and its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, who in early 2017 published a manifesto acknowledging mistakes and vowing to build better communities and a better planet with the help of Facebooks users. To many adversaries such promises have long been "silicon snake oil" and "future hype"--to quote the titles of 1990s and early 2000s books by disillusioned technologists. To critics on the left in particular, the new bosses are not so different from the old bosses, just equipped with state-of-the-art surveillance and manipulation in place of the goon squads of yore. Some wary journalists see an existential threat to their own profession in declarations like those of Zuckerberg. I am not sure any organization really has such power. I will suggest at the end of this chapter that the most serious unintended consequence of platform efficiency may be its opportunity cost, its claim on resources that would in the long run do more to promote real efficiency. One paradox of the movement for efficiency is that innovations that have promoted efficiency and rationality have arisen in spite of discouraging data, driven by intuition and emotion. That does not mean that gut feelings alone are a more reliable guide than data-based analysis, but only that data, and tools for analyzing it, never can take the place of the imagination in foreseeing future patterns of human behavior. Most such intuitions fail. The exceptions fill inspirational and business books. Venture investment has a high failure rate built into it. Yet out of the inefficient maelstrom emerged some of the worlds most efficient technology. *** The history of efficiency should rightly start with nature itself. As biophysicists have discovered, DNA stores energy far more densely than the most advanced technological systems. The control of gene expression allows complex and robust organisms to develop with stunning speed. Tiny variations in the genomes of fruit flies can produce strikingly different behaviors. Evolution has been prodigiously successful in optimizing the flow of information. Leveraging limited resources is our biological heritage. The quest for efficiency seems to be built into human biology as well, as revealed by anthropological and archaeological evidence. There have been tens of thousands of years of innovations in tool making that sometimes reached dead ends but occasionally produced masterpieces of functionality. Think of the Australian Aborigines boomerang, or the Central Asian steppe nomads composite bow. Is any cutting tool more efficient than traditionally forged Japanese blades, or sharper than the obsidian knives flaked expertly by pre-Columbian Native Americans? Turning to the West, many ancient Roman medical instruments were so well adapted to their purpose that similar ones are used today, and their quality was not surpassed until modern times. Roman troops were famous for their ability to assemble bridges and fortifications with a speed that dazzled their adversaries. There was even a kind of mass production of oil lamps, stamped and marketed with early trademarks. Recent archaeology has revealed more dynamism and technologicalinnovation in the ancient world than historians of fifty years ago acknowledged. The slave economy, for example, did not rule out labor-saving machines like water wheels, just as steam engines were used on slavery-era sugar plantations in the early nineteenth century. There was a great deal of efficiency in practice. But the concept of efficiency as we know it had no clear place in ancient life. The ancient Greeks and Romans (and other Mediterranean and Near Eastern societies, including Egypt), had administrative and recordkeeping systems that worked for centuries. But they had no doctrine of systematic improvement of output. The classical historian Peter Thonemann has underlined that Roman society in particular was based on principles of patronage, loyalty, and obligation. There was no theory of wages, interest, or productivity. Prestige was often more important than functionality. Books were written and read as rolls that were stored together in chests. Writing was scriptura continua , no space between words, which space would have increased papyrus and parchment use slightly but made reading and education far easier. The difficulties of reading--manipulating the scroll, looking ahead to determine word breaks--were part of the performance skills of an educated person. That kind of inefficiency was a feature, not a bug in todays terms. Europe of the Middle Ages and the early modern era was a time Details ISBN1400034884 Author Edward Tenner Short Title EFFICIENCY PARADOX Pages 320 Language English ISBN-10 1400034884 ISBN-13 9781400034888 Format Paperback DEWEY 658.515 Year 2019 Publication Date 2019-03-05 Subtitle What Big Data Cant Do Country of Publication United States AU Release Date 2019-03-05 NZ Release Date 2019-03-05 US Release Date 2019-03-05 UK Release Date 2019-03-05 Place of Publication New York Publisher Random House USA Inc Imprint Vintage Books Audience General We've got this At The Nile, if you're looking for it, we've got it. With fast shipping, low prices, friendly service and well over a million items - you're bound to find what you want, at a price you'll love! TheNile_Item_ID:141734396;

Price: 29.38 AUD

Location: Melbourne

End Time: 2024-11-13T02:54:46.000Z

Shipping Cost: 0 AUD